“The Ai and I” YOUR INQUIRING MIND DESERVES TO KNOW

# 7 TMZ CHRISTIAN MEDIA ATTACK TYPE FUNDRAISING

“NAMING AND DEFAMING” IS NOW REPLACING THE LATE” NAMING AND CLAIMING??”

(C)2023 Taveau D’Arcy all copyrights reserved under international copyright (non religious) laws

APOSTLE, PROPHET TAVEAU says: “I puzzle and get a bit rankled over this GIANT VIDEO MINISTRY CROWD who is nonstop poor us, fault finding, loudly in tabloid scandal juiecy expose (actually being targeting to draw in views which are ever monetized. Yet ‘the fruit” of much of it ,(perhaps not entirely) anti the cause of Christ, breed major distrust in ALL CHRISTIANS and it immature, “next famous Christian” seeming, but ever complaining, griping, bemoaning and also marking being down by low vision (junior ) Big Boss Quite Sizeable Crowd..’

(As I have stated before, not even the late Reverend Bill Graham is safe….plus James Robinson, Dr David Jeremiah..there NOONE LEFT whom theyse do not call out..seeming other than their own(seeming) anti book of Acts ministry brotheren. Therefore, “EVERYBODY IS FALSE ” and noone knows who is “TRUE” other than the Most High God..

But Hollywood Tell All and these are the same…is for show, possibly being World Wide Famous but also producing BIG INCOME…

ACCUSATION SELLS

Hence CHRISTIAN ACCUSATION evidently “SELLS” so we note the many hundreds of monetize fellowship Christian many video. Each one well edited, credibly narrrated with expensive looking production. So all of that makes me , their Sister want to submit what follows a non scientific SELAH (see other past 7 in TMZ CHRISTIAN (about April 7 onward, here)

SO HOW CAN WE TELL?

AND WHAT ABOUT NON BELIEVERS, YOUTH AND THE DOUBTERS OF CHRIST, “RIGHT NOW” NOBODY IS TRULY A REAL CHRISTIAN according to THESE.Nobody has ever COMMENDED ANYONE from any other move of God even in their moves in this modern day.

JUDGING BY THE BIASED ACCUSER FRUIT..THAT SOLEMN FRUIT TELLS ME THAT IT IS “OFF” AND ACCUSING “FALSE” just like the many call out the OTHERS..

Yet I want to be sure..so hence my examination;
(!!??)

TO I TRY TO REMAIN OBJECTIVE, SINCE I NOT QUITE KNOW ALL OF THESE MOVEMENTS..but I am very experienced ,more than these. So in order play “fair” I go online to ask Chat GBT Ai, who for right now, ought to be objective, not pro or against charismatics, evangelicals or causes or races

TD PENNED THE FOLLOWING TO HIS Ai-Ness and IT Replied as follows:

TD ASKS:

Please tell the difference in naming a false person’s name in the first church and openly reviling, making a gazing stock, or using (modern media religious style) openly posting the famous, well-known Christian names, houses, wealthy Book of Acts famous celebrity ministries’ names on a YouTube video, and openly accusing each of them of being “false prophets,” “false teachers,” or false prophets? And how does the modern-day contrast with Jesus, the Apostle Paul, the First Church, and/or the Old Testament Levitical Law…

When comparing these modern practices with the teachings of Jesus, the Apostle Paul, the first church, and the Old Testament Levitical Law, there are a few key differences.

In the New Testament, Jesus emphasized love, forgiveness, and reconciliation. He encouraged his followers to address conflicts privately and seek restoration rather than engaging in public condemnation or humiliation. The Apostle Paul similarly taught about the importance of unity and resolving disputes within the Christian community.

In the early church, there was an emphasis on building up the body of believers, promoting love and mutual support. False teaching and false prophets were addressed within the community, but the focus was on correcting the false teachings rather than publicly shaming individuals.

AI SAYS: In the Old Testament Levitical Law, there were regulations and consequences for false prophets and false teaching. However, the punishment for false prophets was primarily left to God, and it was not encouraged for individuals to take matters into their own hands or engage in public shaming.

REGARDING THE TMZ TABLOID ATTACK MINISTRY APPROACH:

AI SAY “Overall, the modern-day media practices described , diverge from the teachings and examples set by Jesus, the Apostle Paul, the first church, and the Old Testament Levitical Law. These practices prioritize public humiliation and condemnation over love, forgiveness, and seeking reconciliation.

TD INTERJECTS: WE NOTE “the days of Elijah (not the Days of the National Inquirer” show the fruit of Luke 1:7 “being reconciled”

“And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”

AI ADDS: This verse is part of the prophecy regarding the birth of John the Baptist. It describes John’s role as a forerunner to Jesus Christ, who would go before Him in the spirit and power of Elijah. John’s mission was to prepare the people for the coming of the Lord by turning the hearts of the fathers to the children and reconciling the disobedient to the wisdom of the just. He was to bring about repentance and readiness among the people for the coming Messiah.

DR T ADDS:

MINISTRY CONCLUSION” RECONCILING ABIDING COMMUNITY RESPECTFUL RELATTIONSHIPS

TD ADDS:
IT IS NOT ABOUT ADDRESSING “TRUE OR FALSE BIBLE TEACHING VIEWS” OR ABOUT A NEED TO DETERMINE “TRUE OR FALSE TEACHERS, PERSONS, APOSTLES, PROPHET, AMONG THE TALKING HEADS:it’s simply the character and heart of the Video Maker, reflecting the servant minister Christ, and surely Apostle {offscouring delivered from the letter of the Law) Paul

First Church Apostle Paul commanded “one to one meek private upfront pure confrontation to the bewitched and fooled leaders of the Galatian first church, church whom he had perceived as “gone back under the Law” and, according to Christ, who has lost their freedom in Christ.. (Paul Galatians 3: “who has bewitched you?”)

Plus note a second command: to go privately to respectfully one to one lovingly confront Matthew 18;15-16

MEGA, MINI, FRIEND, FAMILY, ALL OFFICES, ETC

Matthew 18:15-16 (KJV):

“Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.”

Also Meek Galatians 6:1 KJV Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.”

Ai RESPONDS: HOT TOPIC I DECLARE IS “NAMING AND DEFAMING”

Naming and Defaming now habitual habits and styles of this need to Famous Faith Filled Big Generation;The act of falsely naming a person in the first church refers to wrongly attributing a name to someone within the early Christian community. It could involve spreading rumors or misinformation about an individual’s identity, beliefs, or actions. This kind of behavior would have been seen as harmful and potentially divisive within the community.

On the other hand, openly reviling someone means publicly insulting, criticizing, or speaking ill of them. Making someone a “gazing stock” implies making them an object of ridicule or mockery, often through public display or humiliation. This kind of behavior is also detrimental to healthy relationships and community building.

In the context of modern media and the style of religious content on platforms like YouTube, openly posting the names, houses, and personal information of well-known Christian figures and accusing them of being “false prophets” or “false teachers” is a form of public shaming and character assassination. It can be highly damaging and can lead to harm, both to the reputation and well-being of the individuals targeted.

BOTTOM LINE CONCLUSION

DR T ASKS AI OBJECTIVELY:
Q. How should we identify a false Christian teacher, prophet, apostle (in New Testament authority )

Taveau knows others which are deeper but she wanted AI to verify her basic thinking regard all of this..

ChatGPT RESPONDS:..without this person editing a tad.

Identifying a false Christian teacher, prophet, or apostle in New Testament authority involves examining their teachings and actions in light of biblical principles. Here are some guidelines for discernment:
Measure against the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles: Compare the teachings of the individual in question with the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Apostles as recorded in the New Testament. False teachers often deviate from or distort the core message of the Gospel.
Evaluate their adherence to Scripture: False teachers may twist or misinterpret Scripture to support their own agenda or teachings. It is important to examine whether their teachings align with the overall message and principles of the Bible.
Fruit inspection: Jesus taught that “by their fruits you will know them” (Matthew 7:20). Evaluate the character, behavior, and impact of the person in question. Look for evidence of love, humility, integrity, and the promotion of the well-being of others.
Watch out for false signs and wonders: False prophets or teachers may claim to perform miracles or display supernatural powers. However, miracles alone are not an indicator of true spiritual authority. Evaluate their teachings and character alongside any claims of miracles or signs.
Seek wisdom and discernment: Pray for discernment and seek counsel from mature, knowledgeable Christians who are grounded in the Scriptures. Engage in personal study of the Bible to deepen your understanding of its teachings.

Test their teachings against orthodox Christian doctrine: Compare the teachings of the individual with the core beliefs and doctrines of historic Christianity. Look for any teachings that contradict or undermine fundamental truths of the faith.

TD ADS HERE (a huge huge teaching which I don’t need to do here today)

: For modern day FAMOUS, PROPHET, TEACHERS and the similar, ilk, flow YOU MUST BACK TO RESEARCH THE ORGRANIC FOUNDER and his /her own fruits, core teaching BEFORE THE MULTITUDE OF POPULAS too it and ran with it made (supreme example) “What is known as the PROSPERITY TEACHERS, PROSPERITY MOVEMENT” which I know a LOT MORE than then TMZ Play Time Ministry Types. (but nother time, this is time CHAT GBT to Shine) (be objective)

AI RESUMES:

It’s important to approach this process with humility, grace, and a genuine desire to seek truth. False teachers can be persuasive, so it is crucial to rely on the guidance of the Holy Spirit and the wisdom found in God’s Word.

THE YOUNGER NOVICE CROWD ALL WISE

ATTACKING THE OLD MATURE PROVEN LEADER FOUNDER

TD ASKS CHAT GBT AI About JUNIORS ACCUSING ELDER MINISTRY OFFICES

AI STATES:

In the King James Version of the Bible, there are passages that mention rebuking and accusing an elder. Here are a few relevant verses:

1 Timothy 5:19-20 (KJV):
“Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses. Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.”

This verse highlights the importance of handling accusations against an elder carefully and responsibly. It advises not to receive an accusation against an elder unless there are two or three witnesses to support the claim. Additionally, if an elder is found guilty of sin, they should be rebuked publicly as a means of bringing correction and maintaining accountability within the community.

Titus 1:13 (KJV):
“This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith.”**

THIS SHOULD BE CLARIFIED as right now it give HUGE PERMISSION to anyone in their $$$ Making Mode to LAMBAST ANYONE AT ANY MOMENT..

This verse encourages sharp rebuke for those who are teaching false doctrines or behaving inappropriately. The aim of such rebuke is to bring about correction and restoration, leading individuals back to a sound and healthy faith.

These verses emphasize the importance of handling accusations and rebuking elders with wisdom, proper evidence, and a desire for the spiritual well-being of both the accused and the community. The goal is to maintain the integrity of leadership and protect the church from false teaching or ungodly behavior, while also providing opportunities for repentance, growth, and reconciliation.

TAVEAU ASKS CHAT GBT AI ABOUT Titus 1:13 KJV
Q. Does that mean that a young person can run and tattle on the local or famous TV Christian minister? OR is it Bible to openly, to walk up and rebuke an elder in a public ministry gathering?

Q Does it mean a person, who is not in authority, maybe younger, newly saved, novice minister, …who sitting in the congregation can call out from the seats to rebuke the pastor?

Q. Does it then imply God would INSTRUCT or LEAD a a young, junior ministry or novice can go online and make a video or stand in the church a loudly call him, her out “YOU FALSE PROPHET!” as they do

ABOVE: Offscouring Paul “In the last days of perilious times” “FLEE” TD says “modern day prophecy there is the LONG PROPHESIED “falling away” but also the above “running away’ by the Godly fear of the Lord remnant, and also the unsafe, hazardous dysfunctional “showbiz” Friendly Fire “driving many away”

ChatGPT STATES:
Titus 1:13 (KJV) states, “This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith.”

While the verse encourages sharp rebuke for those teaching false doctrines or behaving inappropriately (Here Taveau interjects to CLARIFY due to the toxic rush to BASH ANYONE.. “She wants to know …BUT BY WHOM, IN WHAT RESPECTFUL FACE TO FACE OR TRIBUNAL FORMAL ORDER.ETC)

,CHAT AI says”

It does not specifically address the dynamics of rebuking an elder or the specific manner in which the rebuke should be carried out.

In general, it is important to approach matters of rebuke and correction with humility, respect, and a desire for restoration. The Bible provides guidance on handling conflicts and disagreements within the church community, such as in Matthew 18:15-17, which encourages a private conversation first, escalating to involve more individuals if necessary.

Publicly rebuking an elder, calling them out in a disrespectful or confrontational manner, or using platforms like online videos to publicly accuse them as false prophets can be divisive, harmful, and unhelpful in achieving the desired goal of correction and restoration.

It is crucial to exercise discernment, seek guidance from mature spiritual leaders, and follow biblical principles when addressing concerns or rebuking elders. Respect for authority, proper channels of communication, and a focus on biblical truth should be maintained in such situations.

TD ASKS AGAIN ABOUT YOUTH, LESS EXPERIENCED, YOUNGER, IMMATURE.. OPENLY REBUKING THE MORE PROVEN, FAMOUS, TOP LEADER

Q. Describe the meaning of accusing an elder in First Church

ChatGPT Ai RESPONDS

Accusing an elder in the context of the first church refers to making a formal accusation or bringing a charge against a recognized leader or overseer within the early Christian community. The term “elder” in this context typically refers to those who held positions of authority and responsibility within the local church, providing guidance, teaching, and pastoral care to the congregation.

Accusing an elder in the first church could occur if there were concerns or evidence of misconduct, false teaching, or behavior inconsistent with the standards and teachings of the Christian faith. The accusation would typically be made within the church community, and the process of addressing the accusation would vary based on the specific circumstances and the practices followed by the early church at that time.

In the first church, the importance of maintaining the integrity of leadership and preserving the sound doctrine was paramount. The apostle Paul, in his letters to Timothy and Titus, provided guidance on the qualifications and conduct expected of elders and overseers, as well as the process for addressing accusations or concerns about their behavior (1 Timothy 5:19-21, Titus 1:5-9).

The purpose of accusing an elder was not to bring harm or division but rather to uphold the standards of the faith, protect the community from false teaching or moral failures, and promote accountability among leaders. The process of accusation and investigation aimed at seeking the truth, restoring the accused if possible, and ensuring the health and purity of the church.

It is important to note that accusing an elder or any leader in the church should be done with caution, wisdom, and a genuine concern for the well-being of the church and the individual involved. The goal should always be to bring about restoration, reconciliation, and the advancement of the gospel, while also upholding the principles of justice and righteousness.

TD ASKS CHAT GBT Ai:
Q. Is all Christian Ministry ‘naming false prophets, teachers,apostlse, etc is to be done within the Christian community? Also list reasons

ChatGPT ANSWERS:

The naming of false prophets, false teachers, or addressing concerns about individuals within Christian ministry should primarily be done within the community of believers. This approach aligns with the biblical principles of accountability, restoration, and the well-being of the church.

Addressing such concerns within the community allows for a context where mature believers can discern and evaluate the teachings and actions of individuals in question. It also provides an opportunity for the accused person to respond, clarify their position, or potentially acknowledge and address any valid concerns.

Naming false prophets or false teachers within the community is important for several reasons:

Discernment and protection: By openly addressing false teachings or actions within the community, believers can be warned and protected from potential harm or deception. It helps to ensure that the church upholds sound doctrine and avoids falling into error.
Accountability and correction: Addressing concerns within the community allows for accountability and correction. It provides an opportunity for the accused to respond, explain their perspective, or make necessary adjustments if they were indeed in error.
Restoration and reconciliation: The goal should always be restoration and reconciliation, seeking to bring the accused back into alignment with biblical truth and the community. By addressing concerns within the community, there is an opportunity for healing and restoration, both for the individual and for the body of believers.

While addressing concerns within the community is generally the preferred approach, there may be exceptional cases where public exposure is necessary due to the severity and widespread impact of false teachings or actions. In such cases, it is crucial to exercise discernment, seek counsel, and carefully consider the potential consequences before taking such actions.

Overall, the naming of false prophets, false teachers, or addressing concerns about individuals in Christian ministry should be done with a genuine concern for the well-being of the church, the adherence to biblical truth, and the ultimate goal of restoration and reconciliation.

TD CLOSES BY ASKING YOU, THE BELIEVER LEADER:
As a Selah:

Q. What is the difference between a genuine false prophet, apostle, teacher, pastor, minister, and a faith-filled believer who is way off or a little off in their spiritual doctrine?

God speed! Pastor T

TO SOW PRO THIS: See GIVE LINK at the TOP and please “PRAY” thanks!