
PART 2 OF 10 “THE AI AND I” ARE YOU SUBMITTED? JESUS AND SUBMISSION
Loading...
So let the Lord tell you when, if!
Taveau D’Arcy Creative Leadership, IFFM Mentoring, DFW Leader Ministry Fellowship,EORR Cross Body Unity New Ministry Viewpoint
The Ministry Apostolic Whole Body of Christ Views Submitted as Selah in Philippians 2:12, not dogma
Note: This series was first posted on June 13, 2023 NOTE the AI Policies have just been updated at the top.
Note: My TCL (“Use of AI” statement at the top of most TCL ministry websites) is to avoid any accusations regarding AI use in the future.
And for anyone’s record: As I have a significant lifelong history of ongoing Bible study, I purposely read over every AI answer to ensure it aligns with what I perceive to be Bible-accurate and TRUE! I am not just posting it casually for everyone to view.
BEFORE WE START: MY FIRST 2 MAIN POINTS “REAL LIFE Qs”
“MAMA, DO WE “HAVE” TO GO TO CHURCH TODAY?
OR…. “MAMA, DO WE “GET” TO GO TO CHURCH TODAY?
Frankly, it’s really USA Fed Up This: if THE MAMA or DADDY or AUNT, Grandma (raising her children’s kids!) and/or SINGLE MAMA/SINGLE DAD, Divorced Parent ,gets repeatedly disrespected,biased toward, plus don’t like to go anyway..
then the CHILDREN stay home, tuned in to their media, while Mom and Dad binge watch on Netflix…
SELAH.
That… all of THIS… is the POINT.
TD Tips: For Pastors, Elders, Leaders
FOR MORE JOYFUL GATHERED SAINTS
Psalm 132:9
“Let thy priests be clothed with righteousness; and let thy saints shout for joy.”
Psalm 132:16
“I will also clothe her priests with salvation:and her saints shall shout aloud for joy.”
FOR FOLLOWERS, MEMBERS, SEEKERS, NEWBIE VISITORS, EXPATS, LONE PERSONS
BE AWARE OF THE SCOWL OF FALSE (ACCUSING) DOCTRINE
The accusing, mirthless, subliminal, and overt controlling letter of the law—Phariseeism, autocratic and dominating personalities—are entrenched in wrong, false, and untrue critical teachings. These individuals continue to spy on ministries, creating division among Christians under the guise of “our kind of ministry authority.”
There is never any authentic Christlike joy (as described in Hebrews 1:9). These individuals are often undeveloped in their leadership, lacking love and a sense of humor. Together, these behaviors may serve as a “warning red flag” to new visitors, signaling potential future betrayal, backstabbing, and the spread of rumors. Dark and subtle forces, even elite white witchcraft without mercy, may be at play, all under the influence of major, top-down control.
MINISTRY AI AND I
ARE YOU SUBMITTED?
PART 2 JESUS AND SUBMISSION
Was the Entire First Church Ephesians 5:21 ?
Was Jesus a Ministry Big Boss Authoritarian? Did He Own People? Big Boss the Little Women?
Which apostolic minister and group of specialized “office ministers” did Christ, then Paul leave OVER the rest of us (to ‘submit to?)
(C)2023 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international law , in conjunction with AI
TD APOSTOLIC CORE PURPOSE
TD ADDS 2025 PRIOR TO 2023 PART 2
AFTER MORE THAN 25 YEARS OF ENCOUNTERING THIS IN MAINLY charismatic ministry Levitical Patriarchism, L Matriarchism, which owns most of the Book of Acts move in gifts, worship..the many thousands upon attending thousands of national, local mega, micro and many LP. (plus all races, many styles ministries who are into titles, hierarchy, Big Boss,however they don’t “target” “go after” hurt people who are not in relationship with them or “UNDER THEM (officially a member)but the WELP DO)..Hence we seek it’s(demonic,territorial and mean religious spirit) deliverance from the Hebrews 10:25 Houses of God: (Most all of this religious accusation, defiling attacking witchcraft legalism is “celebrity ministry connected” (not all, some like mature mega Elevation Church (note: It’s cool but NOT A WORSHIP CULT) are NOT LP or dark targeting sin conscious ministries (use one example, that people might confuse because of SIZE and “media celebrity APPEARING to resemble ,size) (its “doctrine, relationship respect and Christ on the Rugged Cross Top soul winning priority, also diverse BUT “gifts and talents and size matter MORE (that Sharing Jesus respectful love)
And the MAIN PURPOSE in this is to stop abuse, legalism, accusation and murder by the religious spirit which is demonic and character assassinating, reproduces much Evil Eye, Gossip and False Witness, Ruins Many a Reputation, uses witchcraft “(it resembles 2 Timothy 3:1-5 “dysfunction” which Paul says “we must flee from”…
TD ASKS CHAT GPT AI
FIRST THINGS FIRST: What Was Jesus’ Main Mission Thrust?
CHAT GPT AI RESPONDS:
Jesus Christ’s mission on earth can be summarized through two core themes: love and salvation. These principles were the bedrock of His teachings, the essence of His ministry, and the fulfillment of God’s divine plan.
-
Love: At the heart of Jesus’ ministry was the command to love. He emphasized love as the greatest commandment—love for God with all one’s heart, soul, and mind, and love for one’s neighbor as oneself. This form of love was not just a sentiment but a call to action, encompassing forgiveness, grace, and compassion for others.
-
Salvation: Another fundamental aspect of Jesus’ message was salvation. He proclaimed Himself as the way, the truth, and the life, offering humanity the opportunity for reconciliation with God through faith in Him. Jesus taught that through His sacrificial death, humanity could be forgiven for their sins and granted eternal life with God. This path to salvation was not achieved by works alone but by faith in Jesus Christ as the Son of God.
Alongside these core themes, Jesus also addressed key issues of His time:
- Repentance: He called people to turn away from sin and embrace righteousness.
- Faith: Jesus emphasized the need for faith in Him as the key to eternal life.
- Justice and Mercy: He challenged the societal norms that upheld injustice, calling for a radical love and care for the marginalized.
- The Kingdom of God: He preached the good news of God’s kingdom, urging people to seek the kingdom and its righteousness.
In essence, Jesus’ mission was to bring God’s love and salvation to all people, calling them into a relationship with God that was characterized by love, repentance, and faith in Him.
APOSTLE TAVEAU ASKS CHAT GPT AI
Jesus used authority with His disciples, and the first church apostles did too. Please describe it in depth
Also, did Jesus model Ephesians 5:21 “mutual submission in the fear of the Lord,” which refers to “chain of command,” with His first 12 apostles?
AI ANSWERS:
Jesus’ Authority with His Disciples and the Apostles:
Jesus, in His earthly ministry, demonstrated both authority and servant leadership, and this pattern was also carried over by the apostles in their leadership of the early Church. Here’s a deeper exploration of the authority exhibited by Jesus and His apostles:
JESUS’ AUTHORITY
-
Teaching Authority: Jesus’ teaching was distinctive in its authority. Unlike the scribes and Pharisees, who often quoted other teachers or traditions, Jesus spoke with direct, divine authority. He taught with clarity, power, and wisdom, presenting Himself as the ultimate revelation of God’s will. His teachings were rooted in truth and challenged conventional wisdom, calling people to a deeper understanding of God’s commandments and the Kingdom of Heaven.
-
Commanding Authority: Jesus gave direct, often radical commands to His disciples, such as “Follow Me,” “Leave your nets,” and “Go and make disciples of all nations.” His commands were always purposeful and aligned with His divine mission. They were not suggestions but directives that required full commitment and obedience from His followers. This authoritative leadership established His role as the guiding figure for the disciples’ lives and ministry.
-
Miraculous Authority: Jesus’ miracles were an outward display of His divine authority. His power over nature, disease, and death underscored His identity as the Son of God. Whether calming storms, healing the sick, or raising the dead, His miracles served not only as signs of His compassion but also as affirmations of His divine authority.
THE APOSTLES’ AUTHORITY
-
Authority Derived from Jesus: The apostles’ authority came directly from Jesus. As His chosen representatives, they were empowered to carry out His work. Jesus commissioned them to spread His message and to establish the early Church. Their authority was not self-appointed; it was given to them by Christ, and they exercised it with the understanding that they were stewards of His mission.
-
Teaching and Proclaiming Authority: Much like Jesus, the apostles taught with authority. They shared the Gospel, explained Jesus’ teachings, and called people to repentance and faith. Their role in teaching and preaching was foundational for the establishment of Christian doctrine and the growth of the early Church. They were entrusted with the responsibility of preserving and passing on the teachings of Christ.
-
Church Governance: The apostles also exercised authority in matters of Church governance. They made decisions regarding doctrine, resolved disputes, and appointed leaders within the growing Christian community. The apostles played a key role in establishing order and unity in the early Church, ensuring that the message of Jesus was faithfully communicated and lived out.
-
Miraculous Ministry: Like Jesus, the apostles were granted power to perform miracles. These signs and wonders served as confirmations of their apostolic authority and helped to validate their message. Their miracles were a testament to the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit in the Church, just as Jesus had demonstrated the power of the Spirit during His ministry.
TD ASKS CHAT GPT:
How did the First Church and Christ regard Ephesians 5:21 (“mutual submission”)?
AI RESPONDS:
Ephesians 5:21, “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ,” emphasizes mutual submission within the Christian community. This concept calls for humility and respect toward others, urging believers to act in love and unity.
In Jesus’ ministry, we can see an example of submission, though it was not always expressed through a hierarchical “chain of command.” Jesus modeled servant leadership, showing His disciples that true greatness lies in serving others, not in lording over them (Matthew 20:28). He emphasized humility and the importance of placing others before oneself.
For instance, when Jesus washed His disciples’ feet, He demonstrated submission to them, showing that even the leader of the group is to serve. His leadership was not about enforcing authority but about nurturing, equipping, and serving.
The apostles followed this example in the early Church, exercising authority while also emphasizing mutual submission. While they did provide guidance and leadership, their authority was not about power but about serving and building up the Church.
Thus, Bible Ephesians 5:21 “whole Body of Christ” mutual submission in the fear of the Lord aligns with the Christian call to live in harmony, respecting one another in love and humility. The concept encourages a collaborative and humble relationship, where leadership is exercised through servanthood and selflessness.
Mutual Submission and the Chain of Command:
In regards to mutual submission as described in Ephesians 5:21, Jesus indeed modeled this principle, although in a unique and profound way. Jesus’ leadership was not about asserting dominance but about submitting Himself to the will of the Father, even unto death. Throughout His ministry, He demonstrated humility and servant leadership, laying down His life for His followers (John 15:13). He did not lord His authority over His disciples but instead served them, teaching them to do the same.
While Ephesians 5:21 speaks to the principle of mutual submission in the body of Christ, where individuals honor one another in reverence to Christ, Jesus’ leadership exemplified this through His sacrificial love, His willingness to serve, and His ultimate submission to God’s will. The apostles, following Jesus’ example, likewise modeled mutual submission within the early Church, leading by serving, not by dominating.
Thus, the “chain of command” within the body of Christ is not a rigid hierarchy but a structure based on servant leadership and mutual respect, with Christ at the head. In this sense, mutual submission in the fear of the Lord is about acknowledging Christ’s authority and following His example of sacrificial leadership.
TAVEAU ASKS:
Did Jesus discuss submission and use it in His governing authority with the 12 apostles? Did they model this in the First Church, and what about now?
AI RESPONDS:
Yes, Jesus did discuss and model submission in His ministry, though not in the sense of enforcing blind obedience or a rigid hierarchical structure. Instead, He taught submission as a heart attitude marked by humility and service, a principle He emphasized for His apostles and the broader community.
JESUS AND SUBMISSION:
While Jesus had authority over His disciples, He also emphasized submission through servanthood. For instance, He told His apostles that “whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant” (Matthew 20:26). He modeled this in the ultimate act of submission when He washed their feet (John 13:1-17), teaching them that leadership is about serving others, not exercising control.
THE EARLY CHURCH AND SUBMISSION:
The apostles continued to follow this model of servant leadership in the early Church. They exercised authority, but it was always in the context of love, mutual submission, and the purpose of building up the Body of Christ. They taught believers to submit to one another and to respect the roles of leadership within the Church, but their leadership was grounded in humility, not power.
Ephesians 5:21’s call for mutual submission was a cornerstone of the early Christian community, ensuring that relationships within the Church were marked by respect, love, and unity, with each person submitting to the needs of others in reverence for Christ.
SUBMISSION IN THE CHURCH TODAY:
In the modern Church, the concept of submission is still relevant. Leadership in the Church today should reflect the humility and servanthood modeled by Jesus. While various denominations and traditions may interpret leadership and submission differently, the core principle remains: leadership in the Church should not be authoritarian but should reflect the love, humility, and servant-hearted attitude of Christ.
Ultimately, submission in the Church today involves serving one another, submitting to God’s authority, and humbling ourselves to build up the Body of Christ in love and unity. The example of Jesus continues to serve as the model for how Christians should approach leadership and submission in the Church today.
TD ASKS Ai:
Q. How would you describe Jesus the Messiah’s form of government for the apostle and the church like the Hebrew Temple style order or what?
Ai RESPONDS:
Jesus did not establish a specific governmental or administrative structure for His apostles or the early Church that mimicked the Hebrew Temple style order. While the Hebrew Temple had a hierarchical structure with various roles and responsibilities, Jesus’ approach to governance within the Church differed in significant ways.
Jesus emphasized a relational and transformative model of leadership based on love, servanthood, and mutual submission. He taught His disciples to lead by example, to serve one another, and to prioritize humility and selflessness. This approach stood in contrast to the hierarchical structures and power dynamics often associated with institutionalized religious systems.
Rather than establishing a formal organizational structure, Jesus focused on cultivating a community of believers who would follow His teachings and the leading of the Holy Spirit. The early Church, under the guidance of the apostles, operated as a relational and decentralized community where members shared resources, supported one another, and sought the leading of the Spirit in decision-making.
The apostles played a crucial role in teaching, guiding, and establishing the early Christian communities. They were entrusted with the responsibility of transmitting Jesus’ teachings and providing spiritual oversight. However, their leadership was not characterized by a rigid hierarchy but rather by a sense of collaboration and shared responsibility.
In the early Church, decisions were often made collectively through consensus, prayer, and seeking the guidance of the Holy Spirit (Acts 15:28). The apostles and other leaders worked together in unity, utilizing their gifts and discernment to ensure the growth and welfare of the Church.
It is important to note that as the Church expanded and encountered different cultural contexts, it did adopt certain organizational structures and leadership roles to effectively carry out its mission. However, the core principles of servant leadership, love, and mutual submission remained foundational.
In summary, Jesus’ form of government for the apostles and the early Church emphasized relational leadership, mutual submission, and collaboration rather than a rigid hierarchical structure. It was focused on the transformation of individuals and the establishment of a community marked by love, service, and the leading of the Holy Spirit.
The use of hierarchy in ministry within the early Church developed over time, as the Church grew and faced various challenges and organizational needs. While the early Church initially operated in a more decentralized and communal manner, certain hierarchical structures and leadership roles gradually emerged.
I am interested in any Messiah, First Church AUTHORITARIAN ROOTS...When did (and also now) where does authoritarian control come into the First Church?


In the context of the Bible, there are several leadership styles and principles that can be observed. Let’s explore the differences between authoritarian leadership, persuasive leadership, and servant leadership:
Authoritarian Leadership in the Bible:
There are instances in the Bible where leaders exhibited authoritarian tendencies, exercising control and demanding obedience without considering the input or needs of others. An example can be seen in King Saul, who ruled over Israel in the Old Testament. Saul’s leadership was marked by his self-centeredness, disobedience to God, and a lack of concern for the well-being of his people. This style of leadership often leads to negative consequences and can be contrasted with more positive models of leadership in the Bible.
An authoritarian leader exercises control and authority over others in a commanding and autocratic manner. They typically make decisions without seeking input or consensus from others and expect strict obedience from their subordinates. The focus is on maintaining power and control rather than fostering collaboration or empowerment. Authoritarian leaders often enforce their directives through a top-down approach and may use fear, coercion, or punishment to maintain discipline.
Persuasive Leadership in the Bible:
Persuasive leadership, also known as transformational leadership, is characterized by a leader’s ability to inspire and influence others through effective communication, vision, and motivation. This leadership style seeks to build consensus, encourage collaboration, and bring about positive change. An example of persuasive leadership in the Bible can be seen in the apostle Paul, who used his persuasive abilities to spread the message of Christianity and guide early Christian communities. Paul appealed to reason, emotions, and shared values to influence others towards a common purpose.
Servant Leadership in the Bible:
Servant leadership is a leadership style that emphasizes humility, service, and selflessness. It is rooted in the teachings and example of Jesus Christ, who washed the feet of his disciples and taught that true leadership comes from serving others. In the Bible, servant leaders are called to prioritize the needs of others, seek their well-being, and empower them to reach their full potential. Jesus is the ultimate example of a servant leader, as he sacrificed himself for the sake of humanity. This leadership style encourages collaboration, empathy, and a focus on the greater good.
A servant leader, is a leadership style characterized by a focus on serving and supporting others. Servant leaders prioritize the needs and well-being of their followers and work to empower and develop them. They lead with humility, empathy, and a desire to serve the greater good. Rather than wielding authority and control, servant leaders seek to inspire and influence through their example and by creating a supportive and inclusive environment. They encourage participation, collaboration, and personal growth among their team members
(TD Points)
SERVANT LEADER VS TOP CONTROL:
While authoritarian leadership focuses on control, persuasive leadership emphasizes influence, and servant leadership centers on service and selflessness. The Bible provides examples of different leadership styles, illustrating the consequences and virtues associated with each approach.
A LEADERS DEMEANOR, OFFICE, AUTHORITY “TONE”.
(pertains to Authoritarian Ministry)
TD ASKS:
Define the authority demeanor (“coming across as”) of a person who is “strident”
Ai RESPOND
Strident:
The term “strident” is an adjective that describes something or someone as loud, harsh, or forceful in expressing opinions, demands, or criticisms. It implies a strong and often aggressive or contentious tone or manner. A strident person or statement is characterized by being vehement, shrill, or uncompromising in their approach, often provoking strong reactions or disagreements. It suggests a lack of flexibility or willingness to consider alternative viewpoints.
TD WANTS TO KNOW ABOUT
Please address these or similar Ministry DOCTRINES WHICH ARE MINGLED IN THE CURRENT MINISTRIES:
TD ASKS ABOUT DOCTRINES OF THE NICOLAITANS
Please define and describe Doctrines of the Nicolaitans and why God hates them and how they entered the first church. And are they there right now?
CHAT GPT AI RESPONDS:
The Nicolaitans were mentioned in the book of Revelation in two separate instances, in Revelation 2:6 and 2:15. While there is limited information provided about them in the Bible, their doctrines and practices were criticized and condemned by Jesus.
Doctrines of the Nicolaitans: The exact nature of the Nicolaitan doctrines is not explicitly described in the Bible. The term “Nicolaitans” is derived from the Greek words “Nikolaos” (meaning “conqueror of the people”) and “laos” (meaning “people”). Some scholars speculate that the Nicolaitans may have advocated for a form of hierarchical leadership or a separation between the spiritual elite and the common people.
God’s Displeasure: In Revelation 2:6, Jesus commends the church in Ephesus for hating the deeds of the Nicolaitans, implying that these deeds were contrary to God’s will. In Revelation 2:15, Jesus rebukes the church in Pergamum for tolerating those who held the teachings of the Nicolaitans. The exact reasons for God’s displeasure with the Nicolaitans are not explicitly stated, but it is clear that their doctrines and practices were viewed negatively.
Entry into the First Church: The Bible does not provide specific details about how or when the Nicolaitan teachings entered the first Church. It is possible that these teachings emerged as a deviation or distortion of the early Christian message. Over time, as the Church expanded and encountered different cultural influences, various false teachings and practices crept in. The Nicolaitan doctrines may have been one such example.
Current Existence:
It is unclear whether the Nicolaitan doctrines and practices continue to exist in the Church today. The term “Nicolaitans” does not refer to any specific group or sect that is identified in modern times. However, some interpret the warnings against the Nicolaitans as a caution against hierarchical and oppressive leadership structures that may emerge in the Church.
TAVEAU INTERJECTS THIS FROM OTHER PRIOR BIBLE STUDIES (to value and to hear God)
TD NAMES THE “DOCTRINES OF THE NICOLAITANSpossibly as “Nico” meaning “NIKE”… to control..an LAOS ..means the People: THE DOCTRINE OF THE NICOLAITANS IS USE OF FALSE AUTHORITY TO GET ONE’S OWN WAY .meaning top dog ministry leader recurring pressure, manipulation, overuse of hierarchy, instill fear, shame, peer pressure, witchcraft to TOP CONTROL REASON to serve the GRASS ROOTS which is mired in this in too many crayzmatics.
BACK TO THE CHAT GPT REPLY
It is important to remember that the teachings and practices of the early Church were guided by the apostles and their understanding of Jesus’ teachings. The condemnation of the Nicolaitan doctrines serves as a reminder to guard against teachings or practices that deviate from the core message of love, humility, and service found in Christ’s teachings. Christians are called to discern and reject any teachings or practices that contradict the principles of the Gospel.
THE PATRICIAN ELITE
TD ASKS CHAT GPT
Q. DEFINE but also Describe Roman patricianism in light of the Christ First Church and modern church
CHAT GPT ANSWERS:
Roman patricianism refers to the social and political system of ancient Rome, where the patricians were the wealthy and aristocratic elite class. They held significant power and influence within Roman society, often monopolizing political offices and controlling economic resources.
In the context of the Christ First Church and the modern church, Roman patricianism serves as a point of contrast rather than a direct influence. The early Christian movement, including the First Church, emerged in a different cultural and social milieu than the Roman patrician system. The teachings and values of Jesus and the early apostles emphasized humility, servanthood, and equality among believers.
Christ First Church: The First Church, established by the apostles and early disciples, sought to embody the teachings of Jesus and the principles of the kingdom of God. It was characterized by a sense of community, sharing resources, and mutual support. The early Christians did not adhere to the hierarchical and elitist structures of Roman patricianism but instead emphasized love, equality, and unity in Christ. They considered themselves as part of a new spiritual family, where all members were valued and important.
Modern Church: . Many churches today emphasize servant leadership, equality, and the priesthood of all believers. The focus is on fostering a sense of community, nurturing spiritual growth, and engaging in acts of service and social justice.
TAVEAU INTERJECTS ABOUT PATRICIANISM
TD submits that we can defines Roman Patricianism in modern day sr ministry as “stern Aristocratic” “bowing and scraping” to top leaders…it breeds accusing false witness…class systems, much ministry competition and Big I Little You of right now…Also it puts pressure on the immature with ” need to be elite.” Also it’s tends toward merchandising, Big Big Blessed..”respects only certain types of persons” may be ‘exclusive rather divere inclusive”…includes much display of wealth, owning many possessions and/ may idolize the top office, which births many would be copy cats and the need to the next famous, renown, “Christian pop Celebrity” this Fruit of Demas even Eli I SAMUEL top priesthood is rampant in PARTS of TV Media effect certain types of ministry.
, This ministry uses performance, achievement and focuses much on it’s own self own turf and has the Boys, Girls Clubs, elegant and elite but “big respecter of persons ” GOOGLE See the traits of Aristocratic often cruel enslaving impure Roman Patricianism in WIKIPEDIA
BACK TO CHAT GPT
In summary, Roman Patricianism, with its emphasis on elitism and hierarchy, stands in contrast to the teachings and values of the Christ First Church and the modern church. The early Christians sought to embody the teachings of Jesus, promoting love, humility, and equality among believers. The modern church, while facing its own challenges, continues to strive towards these ideals, emphasizing servant leadership, community, and the equality of all believers in Christ.’

In the Old and New Testaments, there is no specific indication or instruction from God to priests, prophets, apostles, or pastors to target, call out, accuse, shame, or engage in negative actions towards individuals for not attending church, not fellowshipping with the saints, not being official church members, or being church hoppers (attending multiple fellowships).

Q. Would you believe that Jesus the Messiah related to women, His mother,all women in Ephesians 5:21, not just men? Ephesians 5:21 “mutual submission in the reverential fear of the Lord”
Q. Concerning St Paul or the first Apostles who governed the Church..how they regard women, leader women, all women?
The apostle Paul and the other early apostles played a significant role in governing and shaping the early Christian Church. Their teachings and actions regarding women varied to some extent, but it is important to understand their overall approach within the cultural context of their time. Here are some key points to consider:
These are some of my favorite apostolic ministry Bible verses about ongoing “relationship pure respect”
“But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.“
“I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, with all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love; endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.
“For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace.
“And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.”

Here are a few Bible verses that mention the term “covering” or “cover”:
- 1 Peter 4:8 (NIV):
- Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins.”
- Psalm 32:1 (NIV):
“Blessed is the one whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered.” - Exodus 40:3 (NIV):
“Place the ark of the covenant law in it and shield the ark with the curtain.” - 1 Corinthians 11:6 (NIV):
“For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head.” - Psalm 91:4 (NIV):
“He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart.”
TD ADDS
I have addressed the topic of having to have “spiritual covering” often before, and there is no such term in the New Testament, nor does Christ, Paul, or the First Church demand it anywhere. It is a concept from old-time ministry, rooted in the Mountain William School of Theology, up in the hollers, combined with the fear of women and major legalistic authoritarian Puritan control. The idea that “Eve was deceived” has led to the belief that all women are accusable, weak, lesser, sly, and easily fooled—essentially labeling them as slaves, vixens, and Queen Jezebels.
My Opinion:
However, let us end on a higher plane of thought: A pastor knows her “rigid ministry turf.”
There is a term which relates to health—watching each other’s backs in prayer through adequate prayer covering, as described in Deuteronomy 32:30:
“How should one chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight....
AMEN
Part 3 of 11 Coming
TO SUPPORT
Polite, Respectful Questions?
(C)2025 Taveau D’Arcy All copyrights reserved under international copyright laws, in conjunction with Ai
