PART 5 "THE AI AND I" CHRISTIAN MINISTERS AND SUPER SPIRITUAL FALSE AUTHORITY : CERTAIN LP NAMES -

“Touching God’s anointed…out in the pews..”

For a great lot of ‘these” believe the “big anointed” means “just them”*

..*their own, mostly occult, elite special selves….

Moral Purpose: Prophetic Charismatic Reform: “Witch watching, far away mind reading, diagnosing”

This is Submitted Selah, a warning and “ONLY. if any shoe fits, should anyone attempt to wear it”

Common Themes and Fruits of These Doctrines Subcultures and More Not Mentioned:

(see many other definitions and CHAT GPT AI Comments SERIES PARTS 1-4)

Authoritarian Control: In these movements, leadership often wields excessive control, creating an environment where questioning or dissent is equated with rebellion, which leads to accusations of witchcraft or Jezebel spirits.
Lack of Relational Accountability: Many of these groups bypass personal relationship, failing to follow biblical protocols like Matthew 18:15-16 or Galatians 6:1. Instead of confronting individuals with love and gentleness, leaders may operate from a distance, relying on prophetic discernment without interaction.
Misuse of Spiritual Gifts: Discernment and prophecy are often used to accuse or control others, rather than for edification or restoration. This results in slander, gossip, and the potential for grievous harm to the body of Christ.
Gender Bias and Misogyny: Women are frequently the targets of accusations, particularly those who challenge or don’t fit within the rigid patriarchal frameworks of these movements.
Spirit of Fear and Control: Accusations of witchcraft and spiritual defilement are often used to instill fear and maintain control over congregations, rather than fostering a spirit of love, unity, and accountability as described in Ephesians 4.

Biblical Evaluation..a Respectful Relationship First Church Basis

Matthew 18:15-16 and Galatians 6:1 emphasize relational restoration—confronting sin with humility and grace. These movements frequently bypass this, leaning toward authoritarianism.
1 John 1:7 and James 3:17 describe walking in the light and wisdom that is pure, peaceable, and gentle. The practices of witch-watching and distant accusations fail to reflect these attributes.
Ephesians 5:21 encourages mutual submission, a principle often lost in hierarchical, authoritarian structures.
Revelation 2:20 warns about tolerating false teachings like the spirit of Jezebel, but the far-off labeling of people without engagement or biblical process twists this into control and oppression.

These practices raise serious ethical, doctrinal, and moral concerns, leading many to question whether such movements reflect the genuine heart of Christ’s teachings or whether they have veered into spiritual abuse, false prophecy, or even occult-like behavior.

Apostle Taveau speaks:

Beneath we submit names of large ministries where this is lack of love, respectful relationship and mature First Church high office protocol is noticed abundantly, repeatedly, by the stranger, alien, new visitor, leader expat and human woman the lone female, maybe any atypical persons. For this ‘spirit” usually appears to be the offshoot fruit of certain charismatic, many pentecost due to far off ministry hierarchal, usually caste system,cult, cliques, such as type casting, respecter of humans and the “wiccan” (twisted like wicker) authority “divining, appear to be cunning sly mind reading .

SEE THIS IDENTIFIED , DEFINED, Spelled out In ARTICLES 1-4 IN THIS SERIES)

Chat GPT Lists the following

Here’s a more focused list that outlines some false doctrines or questionable practices often associated with the apostles in the gates of the city (a coined phrase used for certain types of ministry authority structures), as seen in movements like the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), Christian International, and some Pentecostal, charismatic, and shepherding movements. These movements are marked by anti-woman, witch-watching, and authoritarian leadership practices, sometimes without the biblical foundation of direct relationship or accountability.

1. (T’s coined term =Levitical Patriarchism)/deep south Shepherding Movement

False Doctrine: Heavy emphasis on covering and submission, where believers must submit to human authority for spiritual protection, often leading to authoritarian control and a breakdown of personal freedom in Christ.
Anti-Woman: Women are often relegated to subordinate roles, particularly in leadership or ministry settings, limiting their ability to serve or teach despite biblical examples of female leaders like Deborah (Judges 4-5).
Witch-Watching: There is sometimes a tendency to label women, especially those who are outspoken or nonconformist, as Jezebels or witches, without biblical due process (Matthew 18:15-16) or relational engagement.

2. New Apostolic Reformation (NAR)

False Doctrine: The belief that modern-day apostles and prophets hold governance over cities, regions, or even nations, with authority often seen as equal to or superseding Scripture. This has led to spiritual abuse where leaders impose their authority and label dissenters as rebels or witches.
Anti-Woman: Women in these movements may be excluded from leadership roles unless they conform to specific, often narrow, interpretations of submission and modesty.
Witch-Watching: Prophetic leaders or their followers may claim to have special knowledge or discernment about people being witches or Jezebels, without ever confronting or speaking with the accused in a biblical manner. These accusations often spread through whisper networks or “witch lists.”

3. Christian International (CI)

False Doctrine: Heavy emphasis on personal prophecy and spiritual warfare, often with the belief that prophetic words from certain leaders are infallible or should be followed without question. This can lead to manipulation and control over personal lives.
Anti-Woman: Prophetic ministries within CI may hold traditional or limiting views on women’s roles in leadership or their spiritual authority, branding strong women as rebellious or witch-like.
Witch-Watching: Some prophetic voices within CI and similar networks may accuse people, especially women, of being witches based on “spiritual discernment” rather than biblical criteria, creating a toxic environment of fear and suspicion.

4. Certain Pentecostal & Charismatic Movements

False Doctrine: An excessive focus on spiritual gifts and supernatural manifestations can lead to abuses of authority. Prophets or apostles may feel empowered to pass judgment on individuals, often without personal interaction or accountability.
Anti-Woman: Women may be excluded from teaching or preaching based on narrow interpretations of 1 Timothy 2:12, or be seen as inherently more prone to deception, leading to further isolation or false accusations.
Witch-Watching: In these environments, spiritual leaders may proclaim certain individuals are witches based on perceived discernment or word of knowledge, often without any investigation or relationship with the accused.

5. Assemblies of God (in some cases)

False Doctrine: Some elements within the Assemblies of God or similar Pentecostal streams have adopted authoritarian leadership models, focusing on submission to leadership as a divine command. This can lead to control and exclusion.
Anti-Woman: Though not as widespread, in certain grassroots settings, women may face opposition or suppression in leadership roles, being seen as spiritually weaker or easier targets for deception.
Witch-Watching: In rare instances, some congregations may focus on rooting out witches, often targeting women who don’t conform to the expected roles or behavior patterns, resulting in unjust accusations.

6. Word of Faith (at the grassroots level)

False Doctrine: Overemphasis on prosperity theology and positive confession can lead to control and manipulation, especially when individuals are blamed for their misfortunes due to “lack of faith” or “spiritual rebellion.”
Anti-Woman: While less common in the Word of Faith movement, some grassroots leaders may still hold to patriarchal views, limiting women’s roles and suppressing their potential under the guise of submission.
Witch-Watching: In rare cases, especially in the grassroots circles, some may claim that certain individuals—particularly women—are bringing spiritual harm or curses into the congregation through witchcraft, based on unfounded or speculative discernment.

Apostle Taveau asks Chat GPT AI

The Levitical Patriarchism,(Sister Taveau’s coined training term), also known as the Shepherding movement, NAR, apostles in the gates of the city, and Christian International, certain pentecostal, seems at least some of the Assembly. of God, various tribes of charismatic,spirit filled, tongue talking, apparently few word of faith in the grass roots (not the overhead) and any more, are like the above “far off accusing minus any mature Matthews 18:15-16, meek Galatians 6:21 ..but what are opinions these fine arts doctrinal fruits (in light many mentioned above?

Chat GPT AI answers

Charismatic groups, and (some, enough mention, ornery sorts of grassroots elements within certain mega ambitious Word of Faith highlight some concerning doctrinal and practical trends. To examine their fruits, particularly the doctrinal fruits that arise from these movements, it’s important to assess them in the light of scripture, church history, and their effect on Christian maturity, unity, and discipleship. Let’s break down these movements and their fruits based on the issues you’ve described, particularly in comparison to the biblical standards of Matthew 18:15-16 and Galatians 6:1.

1. Levitical Patriarchy and Shepherding Movements

These movements often emphasize strong hierarchical leadership, with patriarchal authority structures. The Shepherding Movement, in particular, promoted spiritual oversight in a way that often led to heavy-handed control over individuals, affecting both personal and spiritual freedoms.

Concerns:

Spiritual Control: These movements can lead to an unhealthy emphasis on submission and spiritual covering, sometimes resulting in domination rather than servant leadership. This can stifle the personal spiritual growth of individuals and lead to fear-based control, similar to the practices you’ve described (far-off accusations without personal interaction or biblical confrontation).
Matthew 18:15-16: Instead of following Jesus’ model for confronting sin in a relational and private way, some leaders within these movements resort to public condemnation and control without proper engagement or respect for individual dignity.
Doctrinal Fruit: The fruit of these teachings often leads to spiritual abuse, a lack of transparency, and an authoritarian approach that is more Pharisaical than Christlike.

2. NAR (New Apostolic Reformation)

The NAR emphasizes apostolic and prophetic authority. Leaders often claim direct revelation from God, placing them above traditional accountability structures.

Concerns:

False Prophetic Accusations: The practice of labeling individuals as witches or Jezebels without personal relationship or biblical confrontation, which you’ve mentioned, can be more prominent in movements like NAR. Their focus on prophetic insight without the guardrails of scripture leads to spiritual pride, false prophecies, and misuse of authority.
Galatians 6:1: NAR teachings often neglect the biblical instruction to restore individuals with a spirit of meekness. The far-off judgments and accusations show a lack of humility and understanding of Christlike restoration.
Doctrinal Fruit: This movement’s fruit often includes spiritual elitism, authoritarianism, and a culture where prophetic words are elevated over biblical truth, leading to confusion and division within the body of Christ.

3. Christian International (many out in the USA rank and file, not one bit sure about up in the headquarters.)

Christian International, known for its focus on the prophetic movement, shares some of the NAR’s emphases but also focuses on equipping believers for prophetic ministry.

Concerns:

Prophetic Presumption: A key issue here is the tendency to rely on prophetic insights without biblical grounding or relational accountability. This can result in false accusations and character assassinations that mirror the behaviors you’ve described.
Ephesians 4:1-5: The focus on prophecy can overshadow the need for unity, humility, and relational engagement within the church. Far-off prophecy without personal connection is antithetical to biblical fellowship.
Doctrinal Fruit: The fruit here may lead to an unhealthy obsession with spiritual gifts at the expense of character development, humility, and sound doctrine.

4. Certain Pentecostal and Assembly of God Movements (Assembly of God has a good rep in my mind, yet there are certain “ministry older patriarchal types” which during their preaching, still do this)

While many Pentecostal and Assembly of God congregations are healthy, some grassroots movements within these traditions have developed practices of hyper-spiritual discernment, where people are labeled and accused without proper relational or biblical engagement.

Concerns:

Hyper-Spiritual Discernment: This can lead to witch-hunting mentalities, where women or atypical individuals are targeted without the due process of Matthew 18:15-16 or Galatians 6:1. Instead of reconciliation and restoration, there’s a culture of suspicion.
James 3:17: Biblical wisdom is characterized by being peaceable, gentle, and willing to yield, yet some of these movements foster a harsh, authoritarian approach that creates unnecessary division.
Doctrinal Fruit: The fruit here may lead to legalism, isolationism, and a focus on outward signs rather than inward heart transformation.

5. Word of Faith (Certain Big Boss Styles, Grassroots, from what I have seen, it is NOT the top head founders, quite the contrast, it’s out in the more wannabe TV afflicted ranks)

Word of Faith teachings, particularly at the grassroots level, focus on positive confession and prosperity theology, though not all adherents follow the extreme versions of this theology.

Concerns:

Misuse of Authority: In some cases, local leaders may improperly exercise authority, including far-off accusations or assuming that someone’s hardships are due to sin or a lack of faith. This misapplies the doctrine of blessing and cursing, leading to unwarranted judgment.
Ephesians 5:21: These grassroots movements often fail to emphasize the mutual submission and humility that Paul calls for, leading instead to self-righteousness and judgment of others.
Doctrinal Fruit: When pushed to the extreme, Word of Faith teachings can lead to materialism, an unhealthy focus on worldly success, and a lack of compassion for those suffering or struggling.

Assessing Their Fruits in Light of Scripture

The behaviors and doctrinal trends you mention often result in the following bad fruits:

Authoritarianism: Leaders elevate themselves as spiritual authorities, often without biblical accountability, leading to abuse of power.
False Judgment: Accusing people of witchcraft, sin, or other faults without biblical procedures (Matthew 18:15-16) reflects a deep failure in discernment and a lack of compassion.
Division: Far-off prophecies and judgments cause unnecessary division within the body of Christ, rather than fostering the unity commanded in Ephesians 4:1-5.
Pride and Self-Righteousness: These movements can cultivate a culture of spiritual pride, where leaders or followers believe they have special insight or authority over others, contrary to the meekness of Christ (Galatians 6:1).

In Light of Matthew 7:15-20 (KJV)

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?… Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.”

The fruits of these movements, as you’ve observed, often reveal false prophets or misguided leaders. By their actions—sowing division, spiritual pride, false accusations, and abuse of authority—they bear the fruits of thistles rather than grapes.

Moral and Ethical Reflection

From a moral and ethical standpoint:

It is neither fair nor biblical to judge others from afar without personal relationship, interaction, or a proper process of confrontation (Matthew 18:15-16).
The failure to engage humbly and relationally with those they accuse or suspect of wrongdoing reveals spiritual arrogance, not the humble spirit Christ calls us to.
Leaders are held to a higher standard of accountability (James 3:1), and abusing their authority in this manner not only harms individuals but can damage the credibility of the gospel witness in the world.

In light of the Ephesians 5:21 call to mutual submission and Galatians 6:1’s emphasis on gentle restoration, these movements fall short when they engage in control, suspicion, and accusation. True Christian leadership should reflect the humility of Christ and the relational integrity of the apostles’ teaching, which seeks restoration, not condemnation.

Taveau asks ChatGPT AI.

PASTOR, APOSTLE DR T OFFERS THIS INTENTIONAL, ALSO GRACIOUS DISCLAIMER

In light each the large Christians using doctrines, what is there accusation based on false teaching? covering submission ? anti real women or even cult, divining spirit. Is this found in any other ministry style, name?

Dr T asks ChatGPT AI:

As we name some well known movement names, let us make certain to not accuse, but evaluate by fruit, out in the congregation, the regional grass roots.. Thus should we say that EACH PERSON in top leadership command in any of these follows movements does this, or knows about or allows it? ? Can fairly grant grace to top founders and declare that we note how many do what we understand it ministry as describe in the prior 4 articles, that to God’s mercy and out of respect for Hero Founders, who we do not know, nor do we walk in their shoes…MUST WE FAIRLY submit and say that while top may or may do it, that they would now how many people who follow, and model, then are affiliated “under, with them” do it?

ChatGPT AI states:

It would be inaccurate and unfair to say that every single person in top leadership in movements such as NAR, Shepherding, Levitical Patriarchism, and other Pentecostal, Charismatic, or Word of Faith groups all engage in controlling or abusive practices. Leadership styles, theological interpretations, and the application of doctrines can vary widely, even within the same movement or denomination.

Here’s a more nuanced view:

1. Not Every Leader Practices Control

While certain top leaders may be associated with authoritarian control, spiritual manipulation, or the misuse of doctrines like submission and covering, it does not mean that every leader within that movement or denomination necessarily acts in the same way. Leadership styles depend on:

Individual personalities: Some leaders may naturally lean toward control, while others may embody a more humble, servant-leader approach.
Local context: The way doctrine is applied can vary from church to church, even if they are under the same larger movement or affiliation.
Theological convictions: Some leaders may interpret their role as a spiritual overseer very differently, focusing more on pastoral care, humility, and the biblical model of servant leadership (Matthew 20:25-28).

2. Leadership Influence and Modeling

That said, it is fair to say that when top leaders in a movement model controlling or authoritarian behavior, it can influence others who follow them. This happens through:

Imitation of style: Lower-level leaders, congregants, or those affiliated with the movement may mimic the behavior they see in top leadership, assuming that this is the correct or biblical way to lead.
Doctrinal alignment: If the top leaders teach certain doctrines—like submission to authority or the need for “spiritual covering”—in a way that fosters control, others under their influence may adopt these practices without fully understanding the potential for abuse or the distortion of biblical principles.
Organizational culture: Movements often have a cultural ethos or a set of unspoken rules that spread through their networks. If a movement’s culture leans toward heavy-handed authority, that culture may filter down to those who affiliate with or are under their umbrella of influence.

3. Top Leaders’ Responsibility for Their Followers

It’s important to recognize that top leaders in a movement might not always be fully aware of how individuals in their network (pastors, elders, followers) apply their teachings on the ground. However, leaders bear some moral responsibility for the culture they create and the teachings they promote:

Direct Responsibility: If leaders teach or model abusive behaviors directly—such as divining spirits, distant accusations, or heavy control over submission—then they are directly responsible for the negative effects on those under their care.
Indirect Responsibility: If leaders allow a culture of suspicion, fear, or control to develop within their movement without confronting or correcting it, they still hold some accountability for the damage caused. They might not actively control every individual, but by promoting or failing to address these practices, they contribute to the problem.

4. Variability in Practice

It’s also crucial to recognize that some individuals within these movements might be leading with genuine biblical integrity and compassion, choosing to reject the more authoritarian tendencies they see around them. Just because someone is affiliated with a movement does not mean they are automatically guilty of the same abuses happening in other parts of the movement. Many leaders and pastors work hard to:

Build relational trust with their congregations.
Operate with transparency, accountability, and humility.
Avoid the pitfalls of spiritual abuse, false accusations, or authoritarian control.

Conclusion

While it would be an overgeneralization to claim that every top leader in these movements engages in control or spiritual abuse, the influence and teachings of top leadership play a significant role in shaping the practices of their followers. If the doctrine or leadership style at the top promotes unhealthy control, even indirectly, it can lead to widespread abuse throughout the movement. Leaders, both at the top and in local settings, have a responsibility to ensure that their teachings and behaviors are grounded in biblical principles of humility, love, and mutual accountability.

Therefore, while not every leader is guilty, the overall culture and doctrinal teaching within the movement can lead to the proliferation of controlling practices, and top leaders bear responsibility for setting the tone and addressing abuses within their spheres of influence.

Apostle Taveau asks:

Chat GPT AI, by just mentioning these same names, what is your thought on true and false bias, and control, anti certain. women and more in these huge famous big Boss subcultures?

Chat GPT AI answers;

The issues you raised regarding accusations, doctrinal misuse, and potentially false teaching within certain Christian groups (like Levitical Patriarchal teachings, NAR, Christian International, and some Charismatic and Pentecostal movements) can be understood as stemming from a few core doctrines or practices that have been distorted or taken to harmful extremes.

Here are the main doctrinal issues and practices behind these accusations:

1. Covering and Submission Teaching

One of the most common threads among these movements is the concept of spiritual covering and submission, which is often linked to the Shepherding Movement from the 1970s. The idea is that believers need to be under the direct spiritual authority of a pastor, leader, or “apostle” in order to be in the right standing with God. While biblical passages like Hebrews 13:17 mention submitting to leadership, the problem arises when these teachings lead to spiritual abuse, unhealthy control, and manipulation.

Accusations Based on This Doctrine: The idea of submission often becomes a tool for controlling individuals or accusing those who don’t conform to the leadership’s ideas. Leaders may label people as rebellious, “uncovered,” or Jezebels for questioning or not submitting to their authority. This can result in false accusations of being a “witch” or “dangerous” if a person doesn’t conform to leadership or refuses to be under the so-called spiritual covering.
False Teaching and Misuse: The Bible calls for mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21) and emphasizes servant leadership (Mark 10:42-45). However, these movements distort submission into authoritarian control, which leads to spiritual abuse when people are told they can only access God’s blessing or protection by being under a specific human authority.

2. Anti-Women Accusations (Misuse of the Jezebel Spirit)

Many of the accusations aimed at women in these movements seem to stem from the misapplication of the “Jezebel spirit” doctrine, which can be used to target, control, and silence women. Historically, “Jezebel” has been associated with manipulation, control, or sexual immorality, but in some modern contexts, this label is often misused to accuse strong, independent women or those who do not comply with a church’s leadership structure.

Accusations Based on This Doctrine: Women who are seen as outspoken, assertive, or who do not adhere to traditional gender roles may be labeled as “Jezebels,” especially if they challenge male leadership. This also can extend to women in leadership positions being accused of usurping authority or acting outside their “biblical role.”
False Teaching and Misuse: This doctrine misinterprets the story of Jezebel in 1 Kings and Revelation 2:20, applying it broadly to any woman who doesn’t conform to a patriarchal vision of submission. The Bible does not endorse gender-based accusations or the silencing of women but speaks of equality in Christ (Galatians 3:28) and gifts for both men and women (Acts 2:17).

3. Divining Spirits and False Discernment

The practice of “divining spirits” or assuming knowledge about individuals’ spiritual state without personal interaction is another problematic issue. Leaders claim to discern the presence of demonic activity, witchcraft, or sin without ever speaking to or relating to the individuals they accuse. This type of behavior is often found in charismatic circles where prophetic gifts or “words of knowledge” are misused.

Accusations Based on This Doctrine: Far-off accusations (like the “witch lists” you mentioned) can occur when leaders believe they have received spiritual insight or revelation about someone’s character or spiritual status, leading to false accusations of witchcraft, Jezebel spirit, or other demonic influences without any direct interaction or relational context.
False Teaching and Misuse: This is a misuse of the gift of discernment (1 Corinthians 12:10), as true biblical discernment requires personal engagement, humility, and restoration (Galatians 6:1). What is happening in these cases is often more akin to spiritual suspicion or control, where leaders use the language of prophecy or discernment to manipulate or cast doubt on individuals.

4. Cult-Like Practices

In some cases, the overemphasis on submission, control, and prophetic authority in these movements leads to cult-like practices. A cult-like group often has:

Centralized authority that is unquestionable.
Heavy-handed control over the personal lives of followers.
Exclusivity, where those outside the group are viewed as inferior, dangerous, or “not under covering.”
Accusations Based on This Doctrine: Leaders who reject healthy accountability and elevate themselves as “apostles” or “prophets” can create environments where any disagreement is seen as rebellion against God’s anointed. This leads to accusations of witchcraft, Jezebel spirits, or rebellion against those who don’t fully submit.
False Teaching and Misuse: This is in clear violation of biblical principles that promote servant leadership (John 13:12-17), mutual submission (Ephesians 5:21), and the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9). The authoritarianism found in such movements contradicts the heart of Jesus’ teaching about the equality and freedom of believers in Him.

5. Found in Other Ministry Styles

These accusatory practices and doctrines of control, spiritual suspicion, and authoritarianism are not limited to one particular group. They can be found across many ministry styles:

NAR (New Apostolic Reformation): The emphasis on prophetic authority and apostolic leadership can lead to far-off accusations, as leaders claim to have insight or revelation without relational accountability.
Shepherding Movement: As mentioned earlier, this movement promoted spiritual oversight in ways that became controlling and abusive, with unchecked authority and demands for submission.
Christian International and some Pentecostal/Charismatic circles: Prophetic ministry, when misused, can become a tool for spiritual manipulation, leading to accusations and false discernment.

Summing Up False Teachings and Abuses

Covering and Submission Doctrine: Often misused to control others and claim authority that isn’t biblically grounded. Accusations of rebellion are common when someone refuses to submit to a particular leader.
Misapplication of the Jezebel Spirit: Wrongfully used to silence or control women, particularly those who are strong or assertive. This leads to accusations based on gender biases rather than real issues.
Divining Spirits: Leaders making accusations from a distance, claiming to discern spiritual truths without engaging in biblical confrontation or relationship. This is unbiblical and abusive.
Cult-Like Practices: Heavy emphasis on authority, submission, and exclusivity can lead to groups exhibiting cult-like control and manipulation over members.

Biblical Evaluation (with Scriptures in KJV):

Matthew 18:15-16 emphasizes relational restoration—confronting sin with humility and grace. These movements frequently bypass this, leaning toward authoritarianism.
- “Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.” (Matthew 18:15-16, KJV)
Galatians 6:1 speaks of gentleness and humility in restoring those caught in sin, something often neglected in these accusatory practices.
- “Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.” (Galatians 6:1, KJV)
1 John 1:7 highlights walking in the light, a life of transparency and fellowship, rather than suspicion or unfounded accusations.
- “But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.” (1 John 1:7, KJV)
James 3:17 describes godly wisdom as pure, peaceable, gentle, and full of mercy—traits missing from the fear-based, witch-hunting approach.
- “But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.” (James 3:17, KJV)
Ephesians 5:21 encourages mutual submission, a principle of equality in relationships, often lost in authoritarian, hierarchical structures.
- “Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.” (Ephesians 5:21, KJV)
Revelation 2:20 warns against false teachings, specifically the spirit of Jezebel, but misapplying this by labeling individuals without engagement or relational context leads to oppressive control.
- “Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.” (Revelation 2:20, KJV)
Ephesians 4:1-4 emphasizes unity and respect in relationships, urging believers to walk in humility and peace, maintaining the unity of the Spirit. This stands in contrast to divisive practices like witch-hunting.
- “I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, with all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love; Endeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling.” (Ephesians 4:1-4, KJV)
Isaiah 1:18 invites dialogue and reasoning, highlighting God’s desire for relationship and redemption rather than judgment and accusation.
- “Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.” (Isaiah 1:18, KJV)
Luke 1:17 emphasizes the importance of relationships and turning hearts towards one another, particularly in the spirit of Elijah.
- “And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.” (Luke 1:17, KJV)

These practices, rooted in false doctrines of control and manipulation, grieve the Holy Spirit and contradict the relational and humble approach Christ and the apostles modeled. The absence of relational respect, direct communication, and scriptural gentleness calls into question whether these movements reflect the heart of biblical teaching or whether they perpetuate spiritual abuse, false prophecy, or even occult-like practices by relying on fear, control, and divination rather than truth, love, and grace.

Dr T asks Chat GPT AI:

Would any of the Patrician, ongoing perceiver ‘fruits’ (mainly the ones discussed in this present series Articles 1-4) and here…surely by mistake…might these be a form of “grieving holy spirit” blaspheming the holy spirit ” touching God’s anointed (in the pews, or around an area) and similar. However, to each wondering reader, it’s “ONLY IF ANY SHOE FITS”..

Chat GPT AI respectfully answers:

Yes, several of the behaviors you’ve mentioned—such as labeling people as witches, far-off prophetic “mind-reading” without personal interaction, bearing false witness, and creating false accusations—could be seen as forms of grieving the Holy Spirit and possibly touching God’s anointed in the wrong spirit. Here’s a deeper look at how these actions may align with biblical warnings against such behaviors:

1. Grieving the Holy Spirit

Ephesians 4:30 (KJV): “And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.”

What it means: Grieving the Holy Spirit refers to actions and attitudes that cause sorrow to God’s Spirit because they contradict His nature—truth, love, and unity. When leaders and believers engage in unjust accusations, slander, and judgment without any personal relationship or communication, they are acting against the Spirit’s desire for peace, reconciliation, and truth.
Relevant behavior: False accusations, gossip, slander, and labeling people as witches or Jezebels without any attempt at personal confrontation or understanding grieves the Holy Spirit because it destroys fellowship, spreads division, and causes harm to innocent people in the body of Christ.

2. Blaspheming the Holy Spirit

Matthew 12:31-32 (KJV): “Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”

What it means: Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is often understood as the willful and continual rejection of the work of the Spirit, attributing the work of God to evil or denying the Spirit’s witness in Christ. While the actions you’ve described may not directly fit the most common understanding of blasphemy against the Spirit, they could approach this level of error if people intentionally attribute God’s work to evil or misuse spiritual authority for false accusations under the guise of “divine insight.”
Relevant behavior: If prophets or leaders claim to speak for the Holy Spirit but falsely accuse others of being under demonic influence or witchcraft without proof, they tread dangerously close to attributing the wrong spirit to the work of God, which is a form of deep spiritual deception.

3. Touching God’s Anointed

1 Chronicles 16:22 (KJV): “Saying, Touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm.”

What it means: This phrase refers to God’s command that no harm should be done to His chosen servants. In the Old Testament, it referred to prophets, kings, and priests, but in the New Testament context, it also refers to all believers who are part of the royal priesthood of Christ (1 Peter 2:9). When leaders accuse other believers unjustly or target them for slander and labeling, they are “touching” God’s anointed inappropriately, not respecting their dignity as fellow members of the body of Christ.
Relevant behavior: Labeling people as witches, Jezebels, or other derogatory names without any scriptural or relational process violates the command not to “touch” God’s anointed because it harms individuals who are innocent and possibly in need of pastoral care or restoration. False accusations are a form of spiritual attack against God’s anointed ones, who could be fellow believers in the pews.

4. Failing to Discern the Body of Christ

1 Corinthians 11:29-30 (KJV): “For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.”

What it means: This passage speaks about the seriousness of failing to discern the body of Christ. This means not recognizing or valuing the members of Christ’s body as He does. When leaders or fellow Christians misjudge, accuse, or vilify others unjustly, they fail to see the value and dignity of their fellow believers.
Relevant behavior: Accusing believers without proof and engaging in character assassination could bring judgment on those engaging in it. These leaders or groups fail to discern the sanctity of the other members of the body of Christ, treating them as enemies rather than as brothers and sisters in Christ.

5. Sowing Discord and Bearing False Witness

Proverbs 6:16-19 (KJV): “These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.”

What it means: God hates certain behaviors, including false testimony and sowing discord. Leaders or believers who sow division through gossip, slander, and false accusations of witchcraft or being a Jezebel are doing what the Lord considers an abomination.
Relevant behavior: Engaging in gossip, creating witch lists, and spreading rumors are clear examples of sowing discord, something the Lord despises. This behavior leads to spiritual harm in the community and reflects a heart of pride and judgment rather than love and grace.

Conclusion:

These practices—far-off judgments, false accusations, creating witch lists, and targeting others without personal engagement—do indeed reflect forms of spiritual abuse and deep spiritual error. They grieve the Holy Spirit by destroying unity and fostering fear rather than walking in the light of truth, love, and reconciliation. They can be seen as a violation of touching God’s anointed because they harm innocent people within the body of Christ. Additionally, they may reflect a failure to discern the body of Christ, causing division and harm to fellow believers.

Such actions are not only morally and ethically wrong; they are also spiritually dangerous, both to those who are engaging in them and to the broader Christian community. The leaders involved in such practices would do well to heed the warning of Proverbs 6 and recognize the potential judgment they bring upon themselves by violating God’s principles of truth, justice, and love.

Sister T submits: IF CHAT GPT AI and MYSELF ARE FULLY WRONG? So be it. so this is ONLY if any shoe fits. And also a warning to the dear Saints which move in the gifts.

I close with my off mantra, ISAIAH 1:18 “relationship” verse…for this and for all who dwell upon the earth…from here on out..for TIME IS SHORT. As”God’s love covers a multitude of sins” Let us each begin again, afresh at the Start of This New Now! Sister T

“Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.” (Isaiah 1:18, KJV)