WHO'S TO SAY WHO IS TRUE OR FALSE? "FALSE PROPHETS ABOUND"

WHO’S TO SAY WHO IS TRUE AND FALSE? “FALSE PROPHETS” ABOUND

Or is it US who are biased, clueless and eager to accuse?

Hebrews 5:14 (KJV): “But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.”

FOCUS AND PURPOSE ..realistically, discussing, addressing, TRUE PROPHETS, FALSE PROPHETS is a RED FLAG Big Buzz word, which I understand historically AUTOMATICALLY can TRIGGER a “knee jerk reaction.” So I hope that it does…REASON WHY?” it’s to provoke new calm, more Noble Berean also ‘honorable” BIG thought..and a more JESUS LIKE tone in Body of Christ Ministry

(PS JUST KIDDING, PLAYING ON THE HISTORICAL SECULAR UNIVERSAL STEREOTYPE (PSYCHIC,ESP, MEDIUM, MIND READER, IS NOT A CHRISTIAN MINISTRY, BIBLE OFFICE PROPHET) NOT A BIBLE DOCTRINAL “PROPHETIC” TRUTH)

This means GET FELLOWSHIP

Pure BIBLE TRAINING

ASK QUESTIONS

DON’T SETTLE

GAIN “WISE, CAREFUL” EXPERIENCE,

DEEP TRUE BIBLE STUDY,

and PRAYER, PATIENCE..over time..HEBREWS 5:14

Hebrews 5:14 (KJV): “But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.”

THE ABOVE…MEDIA OFFICE PROPHET MODERN PORTRAYALS

The above: This She discovered this Caucasian entirely local grassroots ‘fellowship’ “pastor gathering” fruit…way back when, micro senior ministry turf…(rural). When they are jealous, do not know them (or plan to), view them as a personal rival, or dislike their look, flair, style, or ministry theology, they “automatically” presume that they know more so that that other preacher “must be false.” I have lived this from many micro to multi-campus many mega.

Grassroots are more into their “own office authority” than most, as office titles are more highly valued and also used at these different grassroots senior ministry levels, often competing, real-life doctrinal levels. Also, it depends on their leadership’s “doctrinal.”

Also, it depends on the ministry’s sophistication, formally educated or not, primarily Book of Acts, deep pentecost, charismatic or not.

Many are short, some ‘autocratic‘ (cut and dried, black and white, authoritarian rather than ‘perceiver servant leader’). Also, many are perceived big bosses, hardscrabble, thin-skinned, mean, frustrated, need more money.

Now we see an awful many on media, YouTube, etc. It is my own submitted and equal opportunity truly respecting (non-Pharisee) opinion that most of the worst accusers appear to be non-tongue talkers (BT, seen as Bible Thumper), or flamboyant, or strict stoic, many humorless, steel-hearted Cessationists, even rabidly reviling, forever accusing the more diverse, more energized Book of Acts media preacher. (And I duly note how the tongue talkers, whom they continually accuse as false teacher, prophet, etc., react. They, that are forever lambasted, reviled, never accuse anybody, so I note that!)

I have time puzzled WHY so many use that “calling out names, “attack’ form. For I cannot see it modeled by Christ nor the First Church training. Not by Paul who taught First Church proper order, respect and Community ,order

And I have written many articles, even asked Chat GPT AI about the First Church “accusing, naming false prophets, teachers, etc.” It stated this: “Back in First Church, the church did name false prophets, but kept it within the Christian community and did not name them to secular society. ‘God’s love covers, not exposes’ (God’s love covers a multitude of sins).” Furthermore, Chat GPT AI stated that while the First Church apostles named the false persons to the community, they never reviled or mocked or lambasted them.

Furthermore, I asked Chat GPT AI in Summer 2023, “Was the First Church from Jesus, Paul, apostles, lay, community, marriage all ‘Ephesians 5:21’ mutual submission in the fear of the Lord and servant leaders?” It said yes, even in marriage and leader offices, lay, as this seems to fit with Apostle Paul Ephesians 4 “walk it out in meekness, lowliness, longsuffering, endeavoring to keep the bonds of peace” (See purpose for the “transformed” community later in mid-Chapter 4). It makes the Christian community and witness to society, which is missing today. Next, I asked Chat GPT AI about this: were there any ministry office authoritarians and totalitarians in the First Church? It responded no. Authoritarians and totalitarians did not come into the Church until later when the influences of Rome and Hellenism (Greece) got in.

Last, I also asked Chat GPT AI after Jesus moved up to Heaven, did God set one minister or one group of ministers over all of the other First Church offices and persons? It responded no, for the First Church ruled by consensus. So some of this Christian is false, such as “The apostles in the gates of the city are over all the rest,” which I believe is the core of LP and enslaving patrician (Christian aristocratic), deemed “bowing and scraping people pleasing” (pastor, sheep codependent) fan clubs, apostasy, such as the “I am for Apollos, I am for Paul” (birth of ministry celebrity) autocratic person worship, into big hierarchy, many cults, occult worship cults, big Is, little yous (Submissionism).

Above The Beloved past generation TV Lawyer, Perry Mason, my mystery loving dear Mother used watch his black and white reruns when I was about 5 or so. It made a lifelong impression about being “calmly, quietly aware and observant”

My lifelong ministry Christian senior office history… to call out someone as “a false prophet,” “a false Christian teacher, apostle, or minister” continually provokes high emotional energy, many loud accusers, leader fear, much Bible thumping “on behalf of” the Most High God. It’s like going to war against a “person” who now, seen afar off, as an “it,” not a Christian person but an object who is traitorous, wicked, evil. Let’s tone it down, think it through. Many vindictive in “historical stereotyping,” “combative,” “righteous.” Plus (nowadays, many monetized), often demonic self-righteous zeal. It can even resemble mighty blind murderous rage against the “perceived infidel (which resembles the flavor of the zealous Crusades), which did not reflect the Bible nor God’s respectful, non-dominating, non-accusing, not reviling, and holy pure righteous loving nature.

Basically, just talking to the born-again Christian about “fellow Christians,” mainly on media.

Valid, true, also sent purpose:

While up-front confronting is pure, in the Bible (Matthew 18:15-16, meek leader Galatians 6:1), far-off blanket ministry reviling out loud in public attack, many fellow Christians yet who operate no back under the OT Law, or in “tradition”… However, we admit that there is a lot of dross and mixture in a lot of it, also to be well known, make money, famous name, and TV Hollywood scandal exposes.

Who is fake and who is true is a huge multifaceted deep Christian topic. I am just for toning down the ministry accusation and for training “relationship-respecting” core Bible doctrine.

However, this is only one small step..for this HUGE Subject is too much to delve into in this Submitted as Selah article this day.

This addresses the root of hearing “from the Lord” in a personal, ongoing Christian pure relationship… (Reason for knowing this, Apostle Paul states in 1 Corinthians 14:10c, “There are many voices in the world and each one has significance.”)